Research Studies and Publications
Medisoft Ophthalmology was used for data collection, analysis or was discussed in the following:
1. RL Johnston, JM Sparrow, CR Canning, D Tole et al.
Pilot National Electronic Cataract Surgery Survey: I. Method, descriptive, and process features.
Eye (2005) 19, 788-794
2. JC Javitt.
Editorial: Rule Britannia.
Eye (2005) 19, 727-728
3. Zaidi FH, Corbett MC, Burton BJ, Bloom PA.
Raising the benchmark for the 21st century-the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes, consultant-supervised training and sourcing NHS choice.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 91: 731-736.
4. Brough M. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
Service Implementation-Do Once and Share. Visual failure (Cataract) Action Team. Final Report. 2006.
http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/docs/college/doas/DOAS_Cataract_Action_Team_Final_Report_v1.0.DOC.
5. E A Gavin, C J Hammond.
Intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes.
Eye 22, 935-938 (16 March 2007)
6. J M Sparrow. Editorial.
Cataract surgery: benchmarks for established and trainee surgeons.
Eye 22, 1371-1372 (12 September 2008)
7. P Jaycock, RL Johnston, H Taylor, M Adams et al.
The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally.
Eye (2009) 23, 38-49
8. JD Benzimra, RL Johnston, P Jaycock, PH Galloway et al.
The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications.
Eye (2009), 23, 10-16
9. N El-Hindy, RL Johnston, P Jaycock, T Eke et al.
The Cataract National Dataset Electronic Multicentre Audit of 55,567 Operations: Anaesthetic Techniques and Complications.
Eye (2009) 23:50-55
10. N Narendran, P Jaycock, RL Johnston, H Taylor et al.
The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss.
Eye (2009) 23, 31-37
11. RL Johnston, H Taylor, R Smith and JM Sparrow.
The Cataract National Dataset Electronic Multi-centre Audit of 55 567 Operations: variation in posterior capsule rupture rates between surgeons.
Eye (2009) advance online publication, doi:10.1038/eye.2009.195
12. R Johnston.
Responding letter.
Eye 24, 391-391 (5 June 2009) doi:10.1038/eye.2009.125 Correspondence
13. R P Gale, M Saldana, RL Johnston, B Zuberbuhler and M McKibbin.
Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery.
Eye (2009) 23, 149-152
14. R L Johnston, H Taylor, R Smith, J M Sparrow.
The Cataract National Dataset Electronic Multi-centre Audit of 55?567 Operations: variation in posterior capsule rupture rates between surgeons.
Eye (14 August 2009) doi:10.1038/eye.2009.195 Clinical Study
15. R L Johnston.
Responding letter.
Eye (22 January 2010) doi:10.1038/eye.2009.331 Correspondence
16. NE Knox Cartwright, RL Johnston, PD Jaycock, DM Tole and JM Sparrow.
The Cataract National Dataset Electronic Multi-centre Audit of 55 567 Operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked?
Eye (2009) advance online publication, doi:10.1038/eye.2009.196
PROGRESSOR was discussed in the following studies:
17. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP.
Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;80(1):40-8
18. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.
Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul;234(7):411-8.
19. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.
Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of PROGRESSOR and STATPAC 2.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;81(12):1037-42
20. Membrey WL, Poinoosawmy DP, Bunce C, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.
Comparison of visual field progression in patients with normal pressure glaucoma between eyes with and without visual field loss that threatens fixation.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Oct;84(10):1154-8.
21. Membrey WL, Bunce C, Poinoosawmy DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.
Glaucoma surgery with or without adjunctive antiproliferatives in normal tension glaucoma: 2 Visual field progression.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;85(6):696-701.
22. Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, McNaught AI, Westcott MC, Kamal D, Garway-Heath DF, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA.
Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;87(6):726-30.
23. Nordmann JP.
How to assess the stability of glaucoma? Visual field.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006 May;29 Spec No 2:22-6. French.
24. Strouthidis NG, Scott A, Viswanathan AC, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF.
Monitoring glaucomatous visual field progression: the effect of a novel spatial filter.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):251-7.
25. Aung T, Okada K, Poinoosawmy D, Membrey L, Brice G, Child AH, Bhattacharya SS, Lehmann OJ, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA.
The phenotype of normal tension glaucoma patients with and without OPA1 polymorphisms.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;87(2):149-52.
26. Watson PG, Barnett MF, Parker V, Haybittle J.
A 7 year prospective comparative study of three topical beta blockers in the management of primary open angle glaucoma.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug;85(8):962-8.

Medisoft Limited, Leeds Innovation Centre, 103 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9DF United Kingdom